Welcome ... I’ve always been more attracted to the ordinary than the spectacular. For a long time I’ve sensed my ministry in life as continually trying to seek and understand, express and share, an awareness and appreciation of God in the everyday. I think this is important, not only for the sake of my own taste, but for everyone. If our talking about, and living for, God only appeals to the religious, then most people will be missed. If we know anything about Jesus it is that he went out of his way to encompass the ordinary, so that no-one would be overlooked. So, as I write here, I’ve no idea what I will say or where it will lead. No doubt I will reflect a lot on ‘Christian’ things, but I’m not particularly interested in narrowly religious questions, nor about church affairs. There will, probably, be much football, film and TV. An ordinary life indeed, but one looking for ‘rumours of glory’, I’m asking myself the questions I’ve listed above, and invite you to do the same…

Thursday, 20 February 2014

12 Years a Slave – A Hermeneutic of Privilege

       









‘That’s Scripture.’ ... It is perhaps an odd thing that in such a visceral and disturbing film the most shocking and provocative thing, for me, was such a simple, even throw-away remark.  But it’s true.  A straightforward declaration at the end of one of his regular Lord’s Day homilies, to his assembled family and slaves, plantation owner Edwin Epps calmly affirms not only the justification of slavery itself but also legitimises the brutalisation of disobedience, as God’s will.

12 Years a Salve is full of scripture, whether it be those regular garden party services, grave-side Psalmic despair or slave sung spirituals, God’s word is employed, or implored, with astonishing, and disturbing, variety. But who to believe, and why?

In other, related, news, Steve Chalke has recently called for a ‘global discussion’ on what exactly scripture is and means, as if anyone who is remotely interested has not been troubled by such things before. (I’m inclined to agree with Steve Holmes’ puzzlement that such a debate might be thought ‘new’)  Certainly in my 20 years of pastoral ministry I’ve become increasingly convinced that there is now, perhaps more than ever, no more pressing need for anyone who wants the claims of God’s kingdom to be taken seriously, whether in the hospital ward, the School Assembly or in the pulpit, than that Scripture is understood aright.
So what contribution to this crucial hermeneutical task does this particular piece of cinema make?  Most obviously, it reinforces the age old truth that history is written by the winners. The prevailing understanding of God, in any culture, is what the rich, powerful and influential would have us hear him say.  When ’Scripture’ serves vested interest, especially economic interest, we ought always to be extra careful.  I was reminded of the challenge of Liberation Theology to take hold instead of what it called the ‘hermeneutical privilege ofthe poor’.


For me though, the crucial contribution is much more cinematic.  The deliberate, graphic, intentional violence, to shock, assert authority and humiliate is rare, even in contemporary films.  One parallel seems obvious though.  Perhaps the only modern-day equivalent of the flogging scenes in ’12 years a Slave’ are those presented in Mel Gibson’s ‘Passion of the Christ’.  And there we have it, in action not words, story not doctrine, ‘the word of God made flesh’ and that flesh ripped apart by those with the power to do so. That’s Scripture.